Radio voice as regime of intermediality in Soviet culture


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-8-149-160

Full Text:




Abstract

The article is devoted to the theoretical aspects of the concept of intermediality and the possibilities of its application in the context of Soviet studies. Based on already developed approaches, intermediality is understood as a reference within one medium to the medial characteristics of another. However, such a definition is not enough in the context of Soviet culture. Using the example of the radio voice and its functioning in artistic media products, the author shows that in Soviet culture intermedial configurations are deeply connected to the ideological and anthropological constructs. The medial characteristics of radio (disembodied voice, abstract material mediator, collective listening, structuring attention and others) transmit the current cultural order and can be found in other media, in particular in the films. Thus, a radio voice can be considered not only as an audio phenomenon, but also as the particular discursive mode manifested through materiality of the medium (technical and physical), visual practice of listening to this voice, contexts of listening and textual representation of the voice that “comment on” visual canons. The author suggests using the concept of intermedial regimes for the analysis of such cultural forms.


About the Author

V. V. Pluzhnik
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Victoria V. Pluzhnik, postgraduate student

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, 125993



References

1. Kozlova N. Socio-historical anthropology. Moscow: Kliuch-S Publ.; 1998. 156 p. [In Russ.]

2. Bulgakova O. Voice as a cultural phenomenon. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2015. 568 p. [In Russ.]

3. Rajewsky I. Intermediality, intertextuality, and remediation: a literary perspective on intermediality. Intermédialités. 2005;6:43-64.

4. Schröter J. Discourses and Models of Intermediality [Internet]. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture. 2011. Vol. 13. Iss. 3. URL: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol13/iss3/3/ (data obrashcheniya 16.08.2019).

5. Hänsgen S. “Audio-Vision”. About theory and practice of early soviet sound film at the edge of 1930-s. V: Sovetskaya vlast’ i media. Saint-Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt Publ.; 2006. P. 350–364. [In Russ.]

6. Kaganovsky L. The voice of technology. Soviet cinema’s transition to sound 1928–1935. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2018. 272 p.

7. Orlova G. “Maps for the blind”: policy and politicizing the vision in Stalin era. Visual anthropology: regimes of visibility under socialism. Moscow: Variant Publ.; CSPGS Publ.; 2009. P. 57–104. [In Russ.]

8. Bulgakova O. The Soviet hearing eye. Cinema and its sense organs. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ.; 2010. 320 p. [In Russ.]

9. Posner V. From the film to the cinema show. on the issue of orality in Soviet cinema in the 1920’s – 1930’s. V: Sovetskaya vlast’ i media. Saint-Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt Publ.; 2006. P. 329-49. [In Russ.]

10. Annanurova O. Image and text in the Soviet photoreporting. RGGU Bulletin. “Culturology. Art History. Museology” Series. 2011;17:92-100. [In Russ.]


Supplementary files

For citation: Pluzhnik V.V. Radio voice as regime of intermediality in Soviet culture. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2019;(8):149-160. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-8-149-160

Views: 210

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)