Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

“The most unaffected and artistic of her works”. G. Eliot as perceived by I.S. Turgenev

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-28-39

Abstract

The article discusses the response of I.S. Turgenev to the novel by G. Eliot “The Mill on the Floss” in the context of Turgenev’s novel aesthetics. An attempt is made to systematize the writer’s views on the novel genre: giving preference to the social, Dickensian-Georgesandian type of the novel, the writer does not consider it of the same kind and singles out both the indisputable genre peaks (G. Flaubert, L.N. Tolstoy, G. de Maupassant) and indisputable failures (O. de Balzac, E. Zola). From this point of view, Turgenev’s perception of G. Eliot’s novel poetics is analyzed. The author of the article comes to the conclusion that the novel under consideration is the closest one for Turgenev structurally and ideologically. “The Mill on the Floss” appears to be the writer’s least typical novel, with a tragic denouement, predetermined by the love conflict, and the force of nature, and with a heroine who is very different from her environment and therefore doomed under existing circumstances. The fate of Maggie and the structure of her image are consonant with Turgenev’s search for the hero, but later the artistic searches of both writers diverge: G. Eliot becomes interested in a more complex structure, in which there is room for the evolution of the hero, his (or her) overcoming the framework set by his upbringing or environment, and the ability to move on. Here lies the fundamental difference between her poetics and the poetics of Turgenev.

About the Author

E. I. Samorodnitskaya
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Ekaterina I. Samorodnitskaya, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor

bld. 82, Vernadskii Avenue, Moscow, Russia, 119571



References

1. Harris, M. (ed.) (2013), George Eliot in Context, Cambridge University Press, UK (Literature in Context).

2. Generalova, N.P. (2009), “Belinskii once again (On the literary and aesthetic views of I.S. Turgenev)”, I.S. Turgenev: novye issledovaniya i materialy [I.S. Turgenev. New research and materials], Al’yans-Arkheo, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 241-261.

3. Ginzburg, L.Ya. (1976), O psihologicheskoj proze [On psychological prose], 2nd ed., Khudozhestvennaya literatura, Leningrad, USSR.

4. Gnyusova, I.F. (2012), “George Eliot and L.N. Tolstoy (pastoral traditions in the novels ‘Adam Bede’ and ‘Resurrection’ ”, Vestnik Tomskogo universiteta, no. 365, pp. 15–22.

5. Gnyusova, I.F. (2020), “Between Humility and Passion. George Eliot’s ‘The Mill on the Floss’ and L.N. Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ (Based on Materials from the Yasnaya Polyana Library)”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 64, pp. 120–144.

6. Knapp, S. (1983), “Tolstoi’s Reading of George Eliot: Visions and Revisions”, The Slavic and East European Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 318-326.

7. Lanser, S.S. (1992), “Woman of Maxims: George Eliot and the Realist Imperative”, Lanser, S.S. Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice, Cornell University Press, pp. 81-101.

8. Mann, Yu.V. (2008), “Turgenev – literary critic and philologist”, Mann Yu.V., Turgenev i drugie [Turgenev and others], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 105-136.

9. Markovich, V.M. (1982), Turgenev i russkii realisticheskii roman 19 veka (30–50-e gody) [Turgenev and the Russian realistic novel of the 19th century (30–50s)], LGU, Leningrad, USSR.

10. Pirusskaya, T.A. (2016), “ ‘Retrospection points’ as a structure-forming element of a novel discourse by F.M. Dostoevsky and G. Eliot”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Ser. 9, Filologiya, no. 6, pp. 142–154.

11. Proskurnin, B.M. (2017), “ ‘On the eve of business people’. A new type of woman in the works of George Eliot and I.S. Turgenev”, Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 117–131.

12. Proskurnin, B.M. (2018), “ ‘Adam Bede’ by G. Eliot and ‘Notes of the Hunter’ by I.S. Turgenev: Ideological and poetological roll call”, Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya philologiya, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 149–161.

13. Proskurnin, B.M. and Hewitt, K. (2004), Roman George Eliot «Mel’nitsa na Flosse»: Kontekst. Estetika. Poetika [George Eliot’s Novel “Mill on the Floss”: Context. Aesthetics. Poetics], Perm University Press, Perm, Russia.

14. Pumpyanskii, L.V. (2000), “Turgenev’s novels and the novel ‘On the Eve’ (historical and literary essay)”, Pumpyanskii L.V., Klassicheskaya traditsiya: Sobranie trudov po istorii russkoi literatury [Classical Tradition. Collection of works on the history of Russian literature], Languages of Russian Culture, Moscow, Russia, pp. 381-402.

15. Rignall, J. (2006), “George Eliot and the Idea of Travel”, The Yearbook of English Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 139-152.

16. Rogers, P. (1985), “Lessons for Fine Ladies: Tolstoj and George Eliot’s Felix Holt, the Radical”, The Slavic and East European Journal, vol. 29, no. 4 (Winter, 1985), pp. 379–392.

17. Stroganova, E.N. (2019), “L.N. Tolstoy and English female writers”, Studia Litterarum, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 210–225.

18. Sutphin, C. (1987), “Feminine Passivity and Rebellion in Four Novels by George Eliot”, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 342–363.

19. Tamarchenko, N.D. (1997), Russkii klassicheskii roman 19 v. Problemy poetiki i tipologii zhanra [Russian classic novel of the 19th century. Issues of poetics and typology of the genre], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.

20. Waddington, P. (1971), “Turgenev and George Eliot: A Literary Friendship”, The Modern Language Review, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 751–759.


Review

For citations:


Samorodnitskaya E.I. “The most unaffected and artistic of her works”. G. Eliot as perceived by I.S. Turgenev. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;1(9):28-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-28-39

Views: 227


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)