Синтаксическая сложность академического текста: корпусное исследование работ русскоязычных студентов, изучающих английский язык, в сравнении с текстами профессиональных авторов
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-7-107-129
Аннотация
Об авторах
О. И. ВиноградоваРоссия
Ольга И. Виноградова
115054, Россия, Москва, ул. Старая Басманная, д. 21/4, стр. 1
Е. А. Смирнова
Россия
Елизавета А. Смирнова
614070, Россия, Пермь, ул. Студенческая, д. 38
А. В. Виклова
Россия
Анна В. Виклова
115054, Россия, Москва, ул. Старая Басманная, д. 21/4, стр. 1
И. М. Пантелеева
Россия
Ирина М. Пантелеева
Москва
Список литературы
1. Anthony 2014 – Anthony L. AntConc 3.4.4. Tokyo: Waseda University, 2014.
2. Bhela 1999 – Bhela B. Native language interference in learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage // International Education Journal. 1999. Vol. 1, no. 1. P. 22–31.
3. Biber et al. 1999 – Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S., Finegan E., Quirk R. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman, 1999.
4. Biber et al. 2011 – Biber D., Gray B., Poonpon K. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? // TESOL Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 45, no. 1. P. 5–35.
5. Biber, Gray 2016 – Biber D., Gray B. Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
6. Byrnes, Sinicrope 2008 – Byrnes H., Sinicrope C. Advancedness and the development of relativization in l2 German: a curriculum-based longitudinal study // The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities / L. Ortega, H. Byrnes, (ed.). New York: Routledge, 2008. P. 109–138.
7. Crossley, McNamara 2014 – Crossley S.A., McNamara D.S. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2014. Vol. 26. P. 66–79.
8. Dunning 1993 – Dunning T. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence // Computational Linguistics. 1993. Vol. 19, no. 1. P. 61–74.
9. Ellis 1997 – Ellis R. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
10. Gabrielatos, Marchi 2012 – Gabrielatos C., Marchi A. Keyness: Appropriate Metrics and Practical Issues // CADS International Conference 2012. Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies: More than the sum of Discourse Analysis and Computing? Bologna: University of Bologna, 2012.
11. Gray 2013 – Gray B. More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles // Corpora. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 2. P. 153–181.
12. Foster, Skehan 1996 – Foster P., Skehan P. The influence of planning and task type on second language performance, Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1996. Vol. 18. P. 299–323.
13. Gardner et al. 2018 – Gardner S., Nesi H., Biber D. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing // Applied Linguistics. 2018. Vol. 10. P. 646–674.
14. Hannay, Caro 2008 – Hannay M., Caro E.M. Thematic choice in the written English of advanced Spanish and Dutch learners // Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research / G. Gilquin, S. Papp, M.B. Díez-Bedmar (ed.). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008. P. 227–253.
15. Hawkins 2001 – Hawkins R. Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001.
16. Hinkel 2003 – Hinkel E. Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts // TESOL Quarterly. 2003. Vol. 37, no. 2. P. 275–301.
17. Jucker 1992 – Jucker A.H. Social stylistics: Syntactic variation in British newspapers. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.
18. Lu 2011 – Lu X. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development // TESOL Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 45, no. 1. P. 36–62.
19. Lyashevskaya, Panteleeva 2018 – Lyashevskaya O., Panteleeva I. REALEC learner treebank: annotation principles and evaluation of automatic parsing [Электронный ресурс] // Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories 2018 (TLT16). Prague, 2018. P. 80–87. URL: https://www.aclweb. org/anthology/W17-7612.pdf (дата обращения 26 нояб. 2019).
20. Mazgutov, Kormos 2015 – Mazgutova D., Kormos J. Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2015. Vol. 29. P. 3–15.
21. Nesi, Gardner 2019 – Nesi H., Gardner S. Complex, but in what way? A step towards greater understanding of academic writing proficiency [Электронный ресурс] // Online Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics: Taking Risks in Applied Linguistics, 6-8 September, 2018, York St John University / C. Danjo, I. Meddegama, D. O’Brien, Prudhoe J., L. Walz, R. Wicaksono (ed.). York: York St. John University, 2019. URL: https://custom.cvent.com/01664CE00C344F7BA62E39C4CFE91FA8/files/0f77de05eb81461a8037170680562243.pdf (дата обращения 22 июня 2019).
22. Ortega 2003 – Ortega L. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing // Applied Linguistics. 2003. Vol. 24. P. 492–518.
23. Siepmann et. al 2001 – Siepmann D., Gallagher J.D., Hannay M., Mackenzie J.L. Writing in English: A guide for advanced learners. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag, 2011.
24. Smith 2009 – Smith N. Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Web-Based Course. 2009 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/courses/ling/corpus/ blue/l08_4.htm (дата обращения 22 февр. 2020).
25. Staples et al. 2016 – Staples S., Egbert J., Biber D., Gray B. Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre // Written Communication. 2016. Vol. 33, no. 2. P. 149–183.
26. Straka 2017 – Straka M. CoNLL 2017 shared task – UDPipe baseline models and supplementary materials // LINDAT/CLARIN digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics. Prague: Charles University, 2017.
27. Suárez, Álvarez 2010 – Suárez S.D., Álvarez E.G. The use of it-clefts in the written production of Spanish advanced learners of English // Linguistics & the Human Sciences. 2010. Vol. 6. P. 151–171.
28. Swales, Feak 2004 – Swales J.M., Feak C.B. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004.
29. Warchal 2010 – Warchal K. Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses, consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2010. Vol. 9. P. 140–150.
30. Wolfe-Quintero et al. 1998 – Wolfe-Quintero K., Inagaki S., Kim H.Y. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, 1998.
Дополнительные файлы
Для цитирования: Виноградова О.И., Смирнова Е.А., Виклова А.В., Пантелеева И.М. Синтаксическая сложность академического текста: корпусное исследование работ русскоязычных студентов, изучающих английский язык, в сравнении с текстами профессиональных авторов. ВЕСТНИК РГГУ. Серия «Литературоведение. Языкознание. Культурология». 2020;(7):107-129. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-7-107-129
For citation: Vinogradova О.I., Smirnova E.A., Viklova A.V., Panteleeva I.M. Syntactic Complexity of Academic Text: A Corpus Study of Written Production by Learners of English with Russian L1 in Comparison with Expert Texts of English Authors. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;(7):107-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-7-107-129
Обратные ссылки
- Обратные ссылки не определены.