Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Power as a theoretical-literary category (in the poetry of Aleksei Parshchikov)

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-102-115

Abstract

The author of the article proposes to introduce into active scientific circulation the theoretical and literary category of power, the effect of which he reveals following the poetry of Alexei Parshchikov (1954–2009). The research is based on the works on energy in a work of art by L. Vygotsky, A. Losev and other scientists. The author of the article considers power to be a special literarytheoretic category, correlating with energy as a particular and general. The power in a lyric work is a theoretical and literary category determining the relationship between the objects and phenomena and directing them to a metaphysical continuum, close to an incomprehensible absence. As a category, power permeates all levels of the work – subject-object, chronotopic, compositional, lexical, intonational-syntactic and others. As a vector quantity, it directs the lyrical plot, develops the motive field forward and upward, creating a painful metamorphosis for the subject / object, leading to silence as a blissful time-space. Form (tense or rarefied rhythm, change in the lyrical plot) and content (depiction of earthly existence), developing in opposite directions, neutralize each other. The presence of the verbal motive “power” is the dominant, and not a constant of the “work about power”, the word “power” can be replaced by contextual synonyms (“stream”, “abyss” etc.) or absent (“Hedgehog”, “Coal Elegy”).

About the Author

E. I. Seifert
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Elena I. Seifert, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, Russia, 125993



References

1. Arabov, Yu. (2009), “ Aleksei Parshchikov as a literary project”, Kommentarii, no 28, pp. 73-83. Russia.

2. Barantsev, R.G. (2005), Stanovlenie trinitarnogo myshleniya [The rise of Trinitarian thinking], SPC “RCD”, Izhevsk, Moscow, Russia.

3. Barantsev, R.G. (2013), “Power as a philosophical category”, Grani epohi, no 53, pp. 112-120.

4. Barantsev, R.G. (2014), “Power as a philosophical category from the standpoint of the nonequilibrium thermodynamics”, Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, no 203, pp. 69-77.

5. Epshtein, M. (2000), Postmodern v Rossii [Postmodern in Russia], Moscow, Russia.

6. Ivanova-Luk’yanova, N.G. (2016), “The energems of the word in the teachings of A.F. Losev”, Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, no 2 (741), pp. 200-209.

7. Kedrov, K. (1984), “Metametaphor of Alexey Parshchikov”, Literaturnaya ucheba, no 1, pp. 90-91.

8. Kedrov, K. (1989), Poeticheskii kosmos [Poetic cosmos], Sovetskii pisatel’, Moscow, Russia.

9. Kukulin, I. (2009), “Undercover report on the resurrection of the senses. Poetry of Alexey Parshchikov in the European cultural context”, Kommentarii, no 28, pp. 164-175.

10. Levkin, A. (2009), “Parshchikov’s line”, Kommentarii, no 28, pp. 66-72.

11. Losev, A.F. (1990), “The name philosophy”, in Losev, A.F. Iz rannih proizvedenii, Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, Russia.

12. Losev, A.F. (1993), Bytie. Imya. Kosmos [Being. Name. Space], Mysl’; Rossiiskii otkrytyi universitet, Moscow, Russia.

13. Masalov, A.E. (2017), “Metabol by Alexey Parshchikov”, Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no 2 (75), pp. 137-141.

14. Parshchikov, A.M. (2006), Angary [Hangars], Moscow, Russia.

15. Paund, E. (1997), Putevoditel’ po kul’ture, Sbornik izbrannykh statei [Culture guide. Collection of selected articles], RFO, Moscow, Russia.

16. Seifert, E.I. (2018a), Sila [Power], [Online] Literratura, no 169, available at: http://literratura.org/poetry/2785-elena-zeyfert-sila.html (Accessed 20 June 2020).

17. Seifert, E.I. (2018b), “Afterword of the reader and the author. Virtual (possible) subject (based on the material of the latest poetry)”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series, no. 2(35), part 2, pp. 239–249.

18. Vygotskii, L.S. (1998), “Art as catharsis”, in Vygotskii, L.S. Psihologiya iskusstva, Rostov/ Don, Russia.

19. Ulanov, A. (2007), “Drops of oil”, Znamya, no 9, pp. 217-219.

20. Ulybina, E.V. (2004), “Interaction of body and word in Vygotsky\’s catharsis theory”, Russkaya antropologicheskaya shkola. Trudy, iss. 2, Moscow, Russia, pp. 249-267.

21. Ulybina, E.V. (2006), “The function of art in the cultural-historical psychology of L.S. Vygotsky”, .Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya, no 2, pp. 89-98

22. Zhdan, A.N. (1990), Istoriya psihologii [History of psychology], Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Seifert E.I. Power as a theoretical-literary category (in the poetry of Aleksei Parshchikov). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;1(9):102-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-102-115

Views: 203


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)