“What free verse is not free from”. Discussion about Russian free verse
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-116-123
Abstract
This article explores the role of the discussion “What free verse is not free from”, published in the “Voprosy literatury” magazine in 1972, and in the formation of a discourse about free verse at the stage of the formation and development of the poetic traditions of the Russophone free verse. Special attention is paid to studying the positions of poets the free verse practitioners in order to understand how the poets themselves determined the boundaries of free verse.
About the Author
K. A. EgolnikovaRussian Federation
Kseniya A. Egolnikova, master’s degree
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Burich, V.P. (1972), “What free verse is free from”, Voprosy literatury, vol. 2, pp. 207-226.
2. Kupriyanov, V.G. (1972), “Background and prospects”, Voprosy literatury, vol. 2, pp. 150-155.
3. Kupriyanov, V.G. (2001), “Invisible violin”, Opening speech in the Publication by Nataliya Mets, Arion, no 3, available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/arion/2001/3/125289.html (Accessed 28 July 2020).
4. Mets, A. (1972), “Trends in the development of free verse”, Voprosy literatury, vol. 2, pp. С. 124-130.
5. Orlitskii, Ju.B. (2002), Stikh i proza v russkoi literature [Verse and prose in Russian literature], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.
6. Samoilov, D.S. (1972), “Taking care of the verse content”, Voprosy literatury, vol. 2, pp. 155-158.
7. Slutskii, B.A. (1972), “Is it necessary? And to what extent?”, Voprosy literatury, vol. 2, pp. 145-148.
8. Tarkovskii A.A. (1972), “Traditional” is “accurate»”, Voprosy literatury, vol. 2, pp. 148-150.
Review
For citations:
Egolnikova K.A. “What free verse is not free from”. Discussion about Russian free verse. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;1(9):116-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-116-123