Reviewing the receptive aspect of palimpsest (a case study of T. Pratchett’s works)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-179-187
Abstract
About the Author
E. V. KryukovaRussian Federation
Ekaterina V. Kryukova
Moscow, bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1979), “The Issue of Text in Linguistics, Philology and the Human Sciences. An Essay in Philosophical Analysis”, Bakhtin, M.M. Ehstetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Creation], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia, pp. 281–307.
2. Barthes, R. (1989), “The Pleasure of the Text”, Barthes, R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poehtika [Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Transl. from French. Compl. and foreword by Kosikov S.G. (ed.), Progress, Moscow, Russia, pp. 462–518.
3. Genette, G. (1997), Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, USA.
4. Isaev, S.G. and Vladimirova, N.G. (2017), Aktual’naya poehtika: Smena khudozhestvennoi paradigmy [Latest Poetics. The Change of Artistic Paradigm], Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University Publ., Velikii Novgorod, Russia.
5. Iser, W. (1972), Der implizite Leser: Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett [The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett], München, Germany.
6. Jauss, H.R. (1970), Literaturgeschichte als Provokation [Literary History as Provocation of Literary Theory], Frankfurt am Mein, Germany.
7. Lozinskaya, E.V. (2010), “Cognitive literary studies. Authors, methods, perspectives”, Chelovek: Obraz i sushchnost’. Gumanitarnye aspekty [Human. Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects], vol. 1, Moscow, Russia, pp. 192–225.
8. Lyapushkina, E.I. (2002), Vvedenie v literaturnuyu germenevtiku [Introduction into literary hermeneutics], Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
9. Proskurin, O.A. (2001), Poehziya Pushkina, ili Podvizhnyi palimpsest [Pushkin’s Poetry, or Podvizhnyi (Versatile ) Palimpsest], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.
10. Shatin, Yu.V. (1997), “Menaion and palimpsest”, Ars interpretandi: Sb. statei k 75-letiyu Yu.N. Chumakova [Ars interpretandi. Collected articles to the 75-th anniversary of Yu.N. Chumakov], Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 222–225.
11. Shklovsky, V. (1929), “The Relationship between means of plot construction and general means of style”, Shklovsky, V. O teorii prozy [Theory of prose], Federatsiya, Moscow, Russia, pp. 24–67 [Online], available at: http://philologos.narod.ru/shklovsky/ prose1983.htm#svaz (Accessed 7 July 2020).
12. Stockwell, P. (2002), Cognitive Poetics. An Introduction, Routledge, London, UK.
13. Tyupa, V.I. (2008), “Neklassicheskaya khudozhestvennost’”, Tamarchenko, N.D. (ed.), Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i ponyatii [Non-classical artistic skill. Tamarchenko, N.D. (ed.), Poetics. Dictionary of relevant terms and concepts], Izdatel’stvo Kulaginoi, Intrada, Moscow, Russia.
14. Tyupa, V.I. (2013), “The poetics of palimpsest in ‘Doctor Zhivago’”, Novyi filologicheskii vestnik, vol. 2 (25), pp. 141–152.
15. Zusman, V.G. (2001), Dialog i kontsept v literature. Literatura i muzyka [Dialogue and Concept in Literature. Literature and Music], Dekom, N. Novgorod, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Kryukova E.V. Reviewing the receptive aspect of palimpsest (a case study of T. Pratchett’s works). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;(9(2)):179-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-179-187