Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Reviewing the receptive aspect of palimpsest (a case study of T. Pratchett’s works)

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-179-187

Abstract

The model of literary palimpsest originally put forward by G. Genette is of essential value now, giving an insight into the mechanism of realizing transtextual meanings. Figurative use of the notion of “palimpsest” as a hierarchy of texts shining through each other, be it different versions of the same text or texts intersecting in the common narrative space, presents a new perspective on the modern literary process, when under the influence of mass culture a literary text may consist of not only other literary texts but also those of the cinema or even music. Although the conception of palimpsest has been further developed and refined by different scholars, some of its aspects, e.g. the receptive one, have not yet been studied in detail. Indeed, the receptive aspect of palimpsest is worthy of special attention as the literary process now is inseparable from the recognition of the communicative nature of art, therefore without a reader the literary work’s meaning cannot be actualized. Making a case study of the comic fantasy series by the modern English writer Terry Pratchett, the article considers the way palimpsest functions from the receptive point of view and sums up the effects it achieves.

About the Author

E. V. Kryukova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Kryukova

Moscow, bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, Russia, 125993



References

1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1979), “The Issue of Text in Linguistics, Philology and the Human Sciences. An Essay in Philosophical Analysis”, Bakhtin, M.M. Ehstetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Creation], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia, pp. 281–307.

2. Barthes, R. (1989), “The Pleasure of the Text”, Barthes, R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poehtika [Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Transl. from French. Compl. and foreword by Kosikov S.G. (ed.), Progress, Moscow, Russia, pp. 462–518.

3. Genette, G. (1997), Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, USA.

4. Isaev, S.G. and Vladimirova, N.G. (2017), Aktual’naya poehtika: Smena khudozhestvennoi paradigmy [Latest Poetics. The Change of Artistic Paradigm], Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University Publ., Velikii Novgorod, Russia.

5. Iser, W. (1972), Der implizite Leser: Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett [The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett], München, Germany.

6. Jauss, H.R. (1970), Literaturgeschichte als Provokation [Literary History as Provocation of Literary Theory], Frankfurt am Mein, Germany.

7. Lozinskaya, E.V. (2010), “Cognitive literary studies. Authors, methods, perspectives”, Chelovek: Obraz i sushchnost’. Gumanitarnye aspekty [Human. Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects], vol. 1, Moscow, Russia, pp. 192–225.

8. Lyapushkina, E.I. (2002), Vvedenie v literaturnuyu germenevtiku [Introduction into literary hermeneutics], Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

9. Proskurin, O.A. (2001), Poehziya Pushkina, ili Podvizhnyi palimpsest [Pushkin’s Poetry, or Podvizhnyi (Versatile ) Palimpsest], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.

10. Shatin, Yu.V. (1997), “Menaion and palimpsest”, Ars interpretandi: Sb. statei k 75-letiyu Yu.N. Chumakova [Ars interpretandi. Collected articles to the 75-th anniversary of Yu.N. Chumakov], Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 222–225.

11. Shklovsky, V. (1929), “The Relationship between means of plot construction and general means of style”, Shklovsky, V. O teorii prozy [Theory of prose], Federatsiya, Moscow, Russia, pp. 24–67 [Online], available at: http://philologos.narod.ru/shklovsky/ prose1983.htm#svaz (Accessed 7 July 2020).

12. Stockwell, P. (2002), Cognitive Poetics. An Introduction, Routledge, London, UK.

13. Tyupa, V.I. (2008), “Neklassicheskaya khudozhestvennost’”, Tamarchenko, N.D. (ed.), Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i ponyatii [Non-classical artistic skill. Tamarchenko, N.D. (ed.), Poetics. Dictionary of relevant terms and concepts], Izdatel’stvo Kulaginoi, Intrada, Moscow, Russia.

14. Tyupa, V.I. (2013), “The poetics of palimpsest in ‘Doctor Zhivago’”, Novyi filologicheskii vestnik, vol. 2 (25), pp. 141–152.

15. Zusman, V.G. (2001), Dialog i kontsept v literature. Literatura i muzyka [Dialogue and Concept in Literature. Literature and Music], Dekom, N. Novgorod, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Kryukova E.V. Reviewing the receptive aspect of palimpsest (a case study of T. Pratchett’s works). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;(9(2)):179-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-9-179-187

Views: 252


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)