The Metaphor London-as-the-world as a key metaphor in the structure of the London text of English linguistic culture

The article examines the metaphor London-as-the-World in the structure of the London text of English linguistic culture (i.e., an emic or invariant text for a group of texts related to the British capital). Such an analysis makes it possible to update the most important dimension of the London text: its objects turns out to be a key component of Englishness, being conceptualized as a model of all-English and world processes, as an analogy of the civilized world and the universe. The metaphorical realizations of the London text are seen as the result of conceptual fusion. The research cited in the article is carried out at the junction of the cognitive and semiotic approaches, according to which socially significant mental entities are examined via a semantic analysis of corresponding supertexts. The integration of the cognitive and the semiotic is effected within the framework of unified semantics. Thereby a semiotic analysis of text consists in singling out propositions of diverse degrees of similarity in it, in the selection and classification of predicates with which characters and “things” are endowed in the text, and in the inclusion of individual entities from the text in the general categories, what reveals the picture of the world deep structure from the standpoint of that text. The article draws on the literary canon of New English, and a study into that material educes a continuity in the metaphors and the means of their linguistic expression that were used by the English-speaking community to structure the reality. The article thus postulates the relative stability of London text as a supertextual entity.

metaphor London-as-the-world, ontological metaphor, conceptual fusion, supertext, London text, English literary canon

1. Ackroyd, P. (2000), London. The Biography, London, Vintage.

2. Alibhai-Brown, Y. (2001), Imagining the New Britain, New-York, Routledge.

3. Ball, J. (2004), Imagining London: Postcolonial Fiction and the Transnational Metropolis, Toronto, University of Toronto.

4. Bloom, H. (1994), The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages, New York, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1994.

5. Bochkarev, A.E. (2003), Semanticheskij slovar [A semantic glossary], N. Novgorod, DEKOM, Russia.

6. Chudinov, A.P. (2004), Cognitive-discursive study of political metaphor . Questions of cognitive linguistics. No. 1. P. 89–110.

7. Demyankov, V.Z. (1994), Kognitivnaya lingvistika kak raznovidnost’ interpretiruyuschego podhoda [Cognitive linguistics as a variant of the interpretative approach], Voprosy yazykoznaniya, [Issues in the study of language], No. 4.

8. Johnson-Laird, Ph.N. (1983), Mental Models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.

9. Moorcock, M. (1988), Mother London. Penguin Books, 496 p.

10. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

11. OEDHP (2009), Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles on CD-ROM, Ed. by A.M. Hughes, Oxford University Press.

12. Rastje, F. (2001), Interpretiruyuschaya semantika [Interpretative semantics]. Transl. from French by A.E. Bochkarev, N. Novgorod, DEKOM, Russia.

13. Tejyar de Sharden, P. (1987), Fenomen cheloveka [The phenomenon of the human being], Transl. from French by N.A. Sadovskii, Moscow, Nauka, Russia.