.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Representation of history: contemporary art in museums of conscience
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-8-116-132
Abstract
Contemporary art more and more actively interacts with the non-artistic museums. For instance, biological, historical as well as anthropological museums become spaces for contemporary art exhibitions or initiate collaborative projects. This process seeks to link different types of materials to make the interaction successful. Thus, several questions appear: can we talk about interaction, if the museum becomes a place for the exhibition devoted to the topics of history, ethnography or biology? Does any appearance of contemporary art in the museum territory become a part of intercultural dialogue? And how do we assess and analyze the process of interaction between these two spheres? Among nonartistic museums working with contemporary art the museums of conscience appear to be one of the most interesting. This type of museums is quite new – it developed in 1990s when the International Coalition of Sites of Coscience was created and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum was founded. The interaction between contemporary art and museums of conscience starts to develop in the context of changing attitudes towards historical memory as well as widening the notion of museums. In this situation museums need new instruments for educational and exhibitional work. Contemporary artists work with the past through personal memories and experience, when museums turn to documents and artifacts. So, their collaboration connects two different optics: artistic and historical. Thus, it is possible to use the Michel Foucault term dispositif to analyze the collaboration between artists and museums. Foucault defines the dispositif as a link between different elements of the system as well as optics that makes us to see and by that create the system. The term allows us to connect the questions of exhibition work with philosophical and historical issues when we analyze the projects in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Yad Vashem and Auschwitz-Birkenau.
About the Author
T. Yu. MironovaRussian Federation
Tat’ayna Yu. Mironova, MA in cultural management, postgraduate student
bld. 11, Pokrovskii Boulevard, Moscow, 109028
References
1. Alba, A. (2015), The Holocaust Memorial Museum: sacred secular space, Palgrave McMillan, New York, USA.
2. Assman, A. (2016), Novoe nedovol’stvo memorial’noj kul’turoj [New discontent with memorial culture], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.
3. Foucault, M. (1996a), Arheologiya znaniya [The archeology of knowledge], Nika-Centr, Kiev, Ukraine.
4. Foucault M. (1996b), Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual’nosti [The will to the truth: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality], Kastal, Moscow, Russia.
5. Gibbons, J. (2007), Contemporary art and memory: images of recollection and remembrance, I.B. Tauris, London, UK.
6. Jones, P. (2016), “Museum architecture matters”, Museum and Society, vol. 1 (14), pp. 180–220.
7. Kranz, T. (2014), “The Pedagogy of remembrance as a form of museum education”, The Person and the Challenges, vol. 2, pp. 257–269.
8. Linenthal, E. (1994), “The boundaries of memory: The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum”, American Quarterly, vol. 46, pp. 406–433.
9. Perry, R. (2016), “Holocaust hospitality: Michal Rovner’s living landscape”, History and Memory, vol. 28 (2), pp. 89–122.
10. Simon, N. (2017), Participatornyi muzei [Participatory museum], Ad Marginem, Moscow, Russia.
11. Tunbridge, J.E. and Ashworth, G.J. (1996), Dissonant heritage: The management of the Past as a resource in conflict, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
12. Ushakin, S.A. and Trubina, E.G. (eds.) (2009), Travma: punkty [Trauma: points], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia
13. Yampolskii, M. (2013), Prostranstvennaya istoriya. Tri teksta ob istorii [Spatial history. Three texts about history], Knizhnye masterskie; Masterskaya ‘Seans’, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Supplementary files
For citation: Mironova T.Y. Representation of history: contemporary art in museums of conscience. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2020;(8):116-132. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-8-116-132
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
