Stylistic adequacy of translation when transferring Tajik figures of contrast into Russian
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-259-267
Abstract
This article is concerned with translatability and non-translatability of stylistic techniques, in particular, the issues of the reproduction of Tajik antithesis constructions in Russian, as one of the most popular figures of contrast. The topic, according to the author, is very relevant, because at the present stage of its development, Tajik science does not have research that is somehow related to the antithesis as a linguistic concept. Based on a large material of samples of the antithesis expressions drawn from modern Tajik short prose, the author attempts a comparative analysis of the original and translated texts, while identifying cases of using translation transformations and the degree of stylistic adequacy of translation.
Keywords
translation transformations,
stylistic technique,
contrast figures,
antithesis,
antithesis constructions,
zero translation,
adequate translation
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out within the framework of the project “Educational and methodological support for the activities of Slavic universities” (state assignment, passport No. 2881-21)
About the Author
R. M. Sultanova
Russian-Tajik (Slavonic) University
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Rafohat M. Sultanova, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor
bld. 30, M. Tursunzade St., Dushanbe, 734025
References
1. Retsker, Ya.I. (2021), Teoriya perevoda i perevodcheskaya praktika: ocherki lingvisticheskoy teorii perevoda [Translation theory and translation practice. Essays on the linguistic theory of translation], R.Valent, Moscow, Russia.
2. Fedorov, A.V. (2002), Osnovy obshchey teorii perevoda: uchebnoye posobiye [Fundamentals of general translation theory. A study guide], Filologia tri, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Sultanova R.M. Stylistic adequacy of translation when transferring Tajik figures of contrast into Russian. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2021;(10(2)):259-267. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-259-267
Views:
134
Email this article 