Stylistic adequacy of translation when transferring Tajik figures of contrast into Russian

R. M. Sultanova

doi:10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-259-267

Stylistic adequacy of translation when transferring Tajik figures of contrast into Russian

R. M. Sultanova

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-259-267

Full Text:

Abstract

This article is concerned with translatability and non-translatability of stylistic techniques, in particular, the issues of the reproduction of Tajik antithesis constructions in Russian, as one of the most popular figures of contrast. The topic, according to the author, is very relevant, because at the present stage of its development, Tajik science does not have research that is somehow related to the antithesis as a linguistic concept. Based on a large material of samples of the antithesis expressions drawn from modern Tajik short prose, the author attempts a comparative analysis of the original and translated texts, while identifying cases of using translation transformations and the degree of stylistic adequacy of translation.

Keywords

translation transformations, stylistic technique, contrast figures, antithesis, antithesis constructions, zero translation, adequate translation,

About the Author

R. M. Sultanova

Russian-Tajik (Slavonic) University
Tajikistan

Rafohat M. Sultanova, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), associate professor

bld. 30, M. Tursunzade St., Dushanbe, 734025

References

1. Retsker, Ya.I. (2021), Teoriya perevoda i perevodcheskaya praktika: ocherki lingvisticheskoy teorii perevoda [Translation theory and translation practice. Essays on the linguistic theory of translation], R.Valent, Moscow, Russia.

2. Fedorov, A.V. (2002), Osnovy obshchey teorii perevoda: uchebnoye posobiye [Fundamentals of general translation theory. A study guide], Filologia tri, Moscow, Russia.

Supplementary files

For citation: Sultanova R.M. Stylistic adequacy of translation when transferring Tajik figures of contrast into Russian. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2021;(10(2)):259-267. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2021-10-259-267

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)

Username
Password