Labor in Virgil’s “Georgics”
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-6-114-129
Abstract
The paper considers the concept of labor in Vergil’s “Georgics” in different contexts from labor improbus of Book I to the myth of Aristaeus and Orpheus and labor of the poet himself. It is supposed that along with labor improbus which goes against the world order, brings suffering, and is often fruitless, there is another labor – labor probus. The agricultural labor of Books I and III is hard and often hopeless, and Orpheus lost his wife because his furor ruined him. But the labor of bees, Aristaeus and Senex Corycius is in harmony with the world and the gods, and this labor is not in waste. Bees are not lost irretrievably, Aristaeus following his mothers orders brought back the bees he had lost, and the Corycian garden is full of fruits. Granted the gods’ benevolence and patron’s protection, man of the poem “Georgics” can hope that his labor does not go to waste. That is how the poet also treats his work – the poem
About the Author
O. V. Sharshukova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ol’ga V. Sharshukova, postgraduate student
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047
References
1. Campbell, J.S. (1982), “The Ambiguity of Progress: ‘Georgics’ I, 118–159”, Latomus, T. 41, pp. 566–576.
2. Campbell, J.S. (1996), “Labor improbus and Orpheus’ furor: hubris in the Georgics” L’Antiquité Classique, T. 65, pp. 231–238.
3. Clay, J.S. (1981), “The Old Man in the Garden: ‘Georgic’ 4. 116–148”, Arethusa, vol. 14, pp. 57–65.
4. Gale, M. (2004), Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Galinsky, K. (1979), Augustan Culture, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA. Griffin, J. (1979), “The Fourth ‘Georgic’, Virgil, and Rome”, Greece&Rome, vol. 26. pp. 61–80.
6. Heyne, Ch.G. (1778), P. Vergilii Maronis Opera perpetua adnotatione illustrata a. Hauniae, Sumptibus Severini Guildenal.
7. Jenkyns, R. (1993), “Labor improbus”, Classical Quaterly, vol. 43, pp. 243–248.
8. Lee, M.O. (1996), Virgil as Orpheus: a Study of the Georgics, State University of New York Press, Albany, USA.
9. Page, T.E. (1963), P. Vergilii Maronis Bucolica et Georgica, with introduction and notes, MacMillan&Co, London, UK.
10. Perkell, C. (2002), “The Golden Age and Its Contradictions in the Poetry of Virgil”, Vergilius, vol. 48, pp. 3–39.
11. Plessis, F. (1919), Oeuvres de Virgile, Texte Latin, publiées avec une introduction et de notes par, Hachette, Paris, France.
12. Thomas, R.F. (1988), Virgil. Georgics, vol. 2: Books III–IV, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Thomas, R.F. (1991), “The ‘Sacrifice’ at the End of the Georgics”, Classical Philology, vol. 86, pp. 211–218.
14. Zanker, A.T. (2010), “Late Horatian Lyric and the Virgilian Golden Age”, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 131, pp. 495–516.
Review
For citations:
Sharshukova O.V. Labor in Virgil’s “Georgics”. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(6):114-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-6-114-129
Views:
124
Email this article 