.png)
.png)
Email this article 
The degree of preservation of dialectal features in different generations (Khislavichi district of the Smolensk region)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-5-121-141
Abstract
In the modern dialect of the Khislavichsky district of the Smolensk region, both dialectal features and features of the Russian standard language are observed, the latter actively permeating the dialectal speech over the past decades. we attempt to trace the dynamics of the development of this dialect with the help of quantitative methods which make it possible to establish the frequency of distinctive dialectal features in the spontaneous speech of individual speakers. The study establishes a list of relevant dialectal differences, calculates the proportion of dialectal features in seven idiolects, and creates linguistic profiles of these idiolects presented in the form of radial diagrams. Based on the analysis of these linguistic profiles, three degrees of preservation of the dialect are established, which do not depend on whether the informants belong to the older or younger generation. It is also noted that morphological features are lost first, followed by lexicalized phonological ones.
About the Authors
A. I. RykoEstonia
Anastasiya I. Ryko
bld. 4, Lossi St., Tartu, 50409
M. V. Spiricheva
Russian Federation
Margarita V. Spiricheva, postgraduate student
bld. 9, Tuchkov Line, Saint-Petersburg, 199053
References
1. Avaniesaŭ, R.I. (ed.) (1964), Narysy pa belaruskai dyyalektalogii [Essays on Belarus dialectology], Navuka i tekhnika, Minsk, USSR.
2. Daniel, M., waldenfels, R., von, Kazakova, P., Ter-Avanesova, A and others (2019), “Dialect loss in the Russian North: modelling change across variables”, Language Variation and Change, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 353–376.
3. D’yachenko, S.V., Malysheva, A.V. and Ter-Avanesova, A.V. (2018), “on phonetics of vladimir-povolzhje dialects: jokanje and positional softening of hissing consonants”, Trudy instituta russkogo yazyka imeni V.V. Vinogradova [Proceedings of the V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute], issue 17: Fonetika [Phonetics], Moscow, Russia.
4. Erofeeva, E.V. (2005), Veroyatnostnaya struktura idiomov: sotsiolingvisticheskii aspect [Probabilistic structure of social language variants], Izdatel’stvo Permskogo universiteta, Perm, Russia, 319 p.
5. Kazakova, P.N., Dobrushina, N.R. and Daniel’, M.A. (2016), “Expeditions of NIU VShE: The corpus of dialects of the Ustja river basin and the study of variability in the dialect of Mikhalevskaya village”, Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 250–257.
6. Kochetov, A. (2006), “The role of social factors in the dynamics of sound change: A case study of a Russian dialect”, Language Variation and Change, vol. 18, no. 01, pp. 99–119.
7. Koner, D.V., Makarova, A.L. and Sobolev, A.N. (2019), “Linguistic/dialectal profiling of dialect speakers: The method presented on the idiolectform Berčinovac, Eastern Serbia”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, no. 58, pp. 17–33.
8. Pozharitskaya, S.K. (2005), Russkaya dialektologiya [Russian dialectology], Paradigma: Akademicheskii proekt, Moscow, Russia.
9. Zakharova, K.f. and orlova, V.G. (2004), Dialektnoe chlenenie russkogo yazyka [Dialect division of the Russian language], URSS, Moscow, Russia.
Supplementary files
For citation: Ryko A.I., Spiricheva M.V. The degree of preservation of dialectal features in different generations (Khislavichi district of the Smolensk region). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2022;(5):121-141. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-5-121-141
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
