Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Construction “Which of NP[gen] NP[nom]”. Semantics, syntactics, pragmatics

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-8-14-27

Abstract

   In the article analyzes the semantic, syntactic and pragmatic features of the construction “Which of NP[gen] NP[nom]”, that is implemented mainly within the framework of the dialogue in the model of which of the PronPers[gen] NP[nom]. The most frequent placeholder of the component with the pronoun is the word me. Among the placeholders of the second variable component there are words indicating the social status of the object or its social role; a negative subjective assessment is emphasized by the intonation of SF when using IK-2; from the point of view of pragmatics, SF is used in indirect expressive speech acts.

About the Author

Ya. A. Astakhova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Yana A. Astakhova,  Cand. of Sci. (Phylology), associate professor

125047

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square

Moscow



References

1. Apresyan, Yu.D., Boguslavsky, I.M. and Iomdin, L.L. (1992), Lingvisticheskii protsessor dlya slozhnykh informatsionnykh sistem [Linguistic processor for complex information systems], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.

2. Dobrovolsky, D.O. (2016), “Grammar of constructions and phraseology”, Voprosy yazykoznaniya, no. 3, pp. 7–12.

3. Iomdin, L.L. (2003), “Big issues of small syntax”, Trudy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii po komp’yuternoi lingvistike i intellektual’nym tekhnologiyam. Dialog – 2003. Protvino, 11–16 iyunya 2003 g. [Proceedings of the international conference on computational linguistics and intellectual technologies, Dialogue’2003, Protvino, 11–16 June 2003], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 216–222.

4. Iomdin, L.L. (2006), “Polysemous syntactic idioms: between the vocabulary and the syntax”, Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii: Tr. Mezhdunar. konf. “Dialog” [Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies, Proceedings of the international conference “Dialogue”], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 202–206.

5. Iomdin, L.L. (2013), “Read did not read, but...: About one Russian construction with repeated lexical elements”, Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies. Based on the proceedings of the annual International Conference “Dialogue 2013”, iss. 12, RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 309–322.

6. Rakhilina, E.V. and Kuznetsova, Yu.L. (2010), “Grammar of constructions. Theory, supporters, close ideas”, Rakhilina, E.V. (ed.), Linguistics of constructions, Azbukovnik, Moscow, Russia, pp. 18–79.

7. Rakhilina, E.V. (2010), Linguistics of constructions, Azbukovnik, Moscow, Russia.

8. Starodumova, E.A. (2019), “Syntactic phraseological unit ‘What would I (we) do (-la, -li) without you (you)? (!)’ ”, Nauchnyi dialog (Scientific Dialogue), no. 6, pp. 9–20.

9. Ushakova, A.P. (2018), Syntactic phraseological units with the semantics of ironic disapproval in the modern Russian language, Majoring, PhD Thesis, Yaroslavl, Russia.

10. Velichko, A.V. (2015), “Sentences of phraseological structure as a linguistic and communicative phenomenon”, Russian Language Studies, no. 4, pp. 7–15.


Review

For citations:


Astakhova Ya.A. Construction “Which of NP[gen] NP[nom]”. Semantics, syntactics, pragmatics. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(8):14-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-8-14-27

Views: 139


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)