The concept of a ‘communicative situation’ on the example of an offer situation
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-8-28-43
Abstract
The article considers the concept of a communicative situation as an autonomous fragment of dialogic discourse. The study was conducted on the example of the communicative situation of a speech act (hereinafter referred to as RA) of a sentence. A communicative situation is understood as a microdialogue caused by the realization of the intention of the speaker. We analyze the general meaning of the incentive RA, its semantic types, such as request, proposal, demand, advice, order, etc. and dwell in detail on the ways of formal implementation of the communicative situation of the proposal. Such situation includes several structural elements. 1. Semantic subtypes of RA offers: a) offer of joint action; b) offer of interaction and c) kind offer of help. 2. Each subtype of the sentence is presented in its grammatical varieties, as well as modifications using introductory phrases and particles. 3. The interlocutor’s reactions to each subtype of the sentence speech act, or communicative. The article considers only the communicatives expressing a positive reaction of consent.
About the Author
A. K. Zakaria
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Amir Kooshesh Zakaria, postgraduate student
125047
Miusskaya square, 6
Moscow
References
1. Bezyaeva, M.G. (2002), Semantika kommunikativnogo urovnya zvuchashchego yazyka [Semantics of the communicative level of the spoken language], Moscow, Russia.
2. Belyaeva, E.I. (1992), Grammatika i pragmatika pobuzhdeniya: Angliiskii yazyk [Grammar and pragmatics of motivation: English language], Voronezh, Russia.
3. Glovinskaya, M.Ya. (1993), “Semantics of verbs of speech from the point of view of the theory of speech acts”, Zemskaya, E.A. (ed.), Russkii yazyk v ego funktsionirovanii. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii aspekt [Russian language in its functioning. The communicative-pragmatic aspect] Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 158–218.
4. Formanovskaya, N.I. (1994), “Pragmatics of motivation and logic of language”, Russian language abroad, no. 5-6, pp. 34–40.
5. Khrakovsky, V.S. (1986), Semantika i tipologiya imperativa. Russkii imperativ [Semantics and typology of the imperative. Russian imperative], Nauka, Lenigrad.
6. Searle, J.R. (1986), “A classification of illocutionary acts”, Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. 17: Teoriya rechevykh aktov [New in foreign linguistics, iss. 17, The Theory of Speech Acts], Progress, Moscow, Russia, pp. 170–187.
7. Sharonov, I.A. (2018), “Paranthetical words and communicatives: Semantic and pragmatic aspects of the description of introductory words”, Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, no. 51, pp. 58–68.
8. Sharonov, I.A. (2016), “Discursive words and communicatives”, Computer Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference “Dialogue”, iss. 15, pp. 538–547.
9. Sharonov, I.A. (1991), The category of inclination in the communicative-pragmatic aspect, Abstract of PhD dissertation, Moscow, Russia.
10. Shatunovsky, I.B. (2016), Rechevye deistviya i deistviya mysli v russkom yazyke [Speech actions and actions of thought in the Russian language], YaSK, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Zakaria A.K. The concept of a ‘communicative situation’ on the example of an offer situation. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(8):28-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-8-28-43
Views:
140
Email this article 