Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Parentheses expressing (un)certainty in the Telegram media channels: word frequency

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-5-153-185

Abstract

The paper studies the frequency of epistemic parentheses (bezuslovno ‘definitely’, verojatno ‘probably’, kazhetsya ‘likely’, konechno ‘of course’, etc.) in the news issued by the official media channels in Telegram. The article analyzes the hypothesis that the excessive or rare use of such linguistic units by the media channels may reflect not only their thematic or stylistic preferences, but also their political orientation. As the statistical analysis shows, the media that “prefer” parentheses expressing certainty tend to follow the official Russian ideology. According to authors’ observations the pro-government agencies often use the parentheses of uncertainty to introduce a subjective opinion and to frame the indirect questions (proposals) and rhetorical questions. The oppositional sources, on the contrary, avoid the active use of lexical units that clearly indicate the speaker’s certainty or uncertainty in the reported fact, using other methods of speech impact.

The frequency of epistemic parentheses in the media texts can serve as a quite reliable marker, not only of the political orientation of the channel and the general content of its news, but also of the potential manipulative influence of its texts on the readers.

About the Authors

S. I. Pereverzeva
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Svetlana I. Pereverzeva, Cand. of Sci. (Philology)

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047



A. A. Kotov
Russian State University for the Humanities; Kurchatov Institute; Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation

Artemy A. Kotov, Cand. of Sci. (Philology)

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047

bld. 1, Akademic Kurchatov Square, Moscow, 123182

bld. 38 (1), Ostozhenka, Moscow, 119034



Ya. A. Zherebtsova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Yana A. Zherebtsova

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047



A. A. Zinina
Kurchatov Institute; Russian State University for the Humanities; Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation

Anna A. Zinina, Cand. of Sci. (Psychology)

bld. 1, Akademic Kurchatov Square, Moscow, 123182

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047

bld. 38 (1), Ostozhenka, Moscow, 119034



References

1. Bulygina, T.V. (ed.) (1992), Chelovecheskii faktor v yazyke: kommunikatsiya, modal’nost’, deiksis [The human factor in language. Communication, modality, deixis], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.

2. Dragun, E.M. (2015), Infotainment as a phenomenon of modern media culture, Abstract of PhD dissertation, Moscow, Russia.

3. Elatik, A.A. (2016), “Elements of spoken syntax in modern Russian electronic media”, Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, no. 10 (64), part 3, pp. 161–168.

4. Evdokimov, V.A. (2010), “Infotainment in mass media. A panacea for boredom and ersatz discussion”, Russian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, no. 5, pp. 214–219.

5. Graber, D.A. (1994), “The Infotainment Quotient in Routine Television News: A Director’s Perspective”, Discourse & Society, vol. 5, iss. 4, pp. 483–508.

6. Hyland, K. (2005), Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing, Continuum, London, UK.

7. Ioanesyan, E.R. (1993), “Classification of mental predicates according to the type of judgments they introduce”, Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Mental’nye deistviya [Logical analysis of language. Mental actions], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 89–95.

8. Kiseleva, K. and Paiar, D. (2003), “Mechanisms of semantic variation using the example of a group of units with the root -vid-: vidimo, po-vidimomu, vidno”, Diskursivnye slova russkogo yazyka [Discursive words of the Russian language], Moscow, Russia, pp. 50–79.

9. Kiseleva, K. and Paiar, D. (eds.) (1998), Diskursivnye slova russkogo yazyka: opyt kontekstno-semanticheskogo opisaniya [Discursive words of the Russian language. An essay on contextual-semantic description], Metatekst, Moscow, Russia, pp. 309–316.

10. Kotov, A.A. (2021), Mekhanizmy rechevogo vozdeistviya [Mechanisms of speech impact], RGGU, Moscow, Russia.

11. Kuksa, I.Yu. (2008), “Means of expressing the modal meaning of confidence/uncertainty in newspaper texts of the first half of the 19th century”, Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, no. 8, pp. 59–64.

12. Kuksa, I.Yu. (2011), “Means of expressing the modal meaning of reliability in the Vedomosti newspaper”, Vestnik VSU. Series: Philology. Journalism, no. 1, pp. 38–41.

13. Moiseeva, A.V. and Titlova, A.S. (2019), “Manipulative potential of microblog text (based on the example of analysis of text comments on news Twitter)”, Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 996–1002.

14. Paducheva, E.V. (2010), Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deistvitel’nost’yu: Referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimenii [The statement and its correlation with reality. Referential aspects of the pronouns semantics], LKI, Moscow, Russia.

15. Povarnin, S.I. (1990), “Dispute. On the theory and practice of dispute”, Voprosy filosofii, no. 3, pp. 57–133.

16. Razlogova, E.E. (2005), Logical-cognitive and stylistic aspects of the semantics of modal words, Abstract of PhD dissertation, Moscow, Russia.

17. Scott, D.K. and Gobetz, R.H. (1990), Hard News/Soft News Content of the National Broadcast Networks, paper presented at the Central States Communication Association Convention, Detroit MI.

18. Thussu, D.K. (2015), “Infotainment”, The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc152

19. Trnavac, R. and Taboada, M. (2023), “Engagement and constructiveness in online news comments in English and Russian”, Text & Talk, vol. 43, no 2, pp. 235–262.

20. Yakovleva, E.S. (1994), Fragmenty russkoi yazykovoi kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni i vospriyatiya) [Fragments of the Russian linguistic picture of the world (models of space, time and perception)], Gnozis, Moscow, Russia.

21. Zaliznyak, Anna A. (1991), “Proposing and thinking. Two types of opinion”, Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Kul’turnye kontsepty [Logical analysis of language. Cultural concepts.], Moscow, Russia, pp. 187–194.


Review

For citations:


Pereverzeva S.I., Kotov A.A., Zherebtsova Ya.A., Zinina A.A. Parentheses expressing (un)certainty in the Telegram media channels: word frequency. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2023;(5):153-185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-5-153-185

Views: 93


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)