.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Between truth and absurdity? Turn-of-the-century taxidermists look at snapshots of animals
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-4-105-124
Abstract
The article considers a parallel between photography and taxidermy and interrogates the attitudes to instant photography as a way of acquiring and communicating scientific knowledge by the professional community of taxidermists at the turn of the twentieth century. The debates as to whether snapshots of animals could serve as models for taxidermy shed light on the different approaches to visualization of nature in the historical period marked by the paradigm of scientific objectivity, as described in the seminal work by Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison. As the article shows taxidermists equally committed to the ideal of objectivity could welcome the increased knowledge on the mechanics of animal movements achieved through photography, or dismiss the information thus obtained as irrelevant. The article describes both positions and analyzes the influences which might have shaped them. The debate about the applicability of photography in general and instant photography in particular as a model for making stuffed animals illustrates the mobility of boundaries and the tense relationship between science and art, innovation and canon, visual and material, the representation of phenomena and communication of their essence to a wide audience.
About the Author
Ksenia O. GusarovaRussian Federation
Ksenia O. Gusarova, Cand. of Sci. (Cultural Studies),
6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047.
References
1. Aloi, G. (2018), Speculative taxidermy. Natural history, animal surface, and art in the anthropocene, Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
2. Bainbridge, D. (2018), Stripped bare. The art of animal anatomy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
3. Barthes, R. (2011), Camera lucida: Kommentarii k fotografii [Camera Lucida], Ad Marginem, Moscow, Russia.
4. Benjamin, W. (2000), “The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction”, in Benjamin, W., Ozareniya [Illuminations], Martis, Moscow, Russia.
5. Cowie, H. (2021), Victims of fashion, Animal commodities in Victorian Britain, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Crary, J. (2014), Tekhniki nablyudatelya: Videnie i sovremennost’ v XIX v. [Techniques of the observer. On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century], V-A-C press, Moscow, Russia.
7. Daly, N. (2015), The demographic imagination and the 19th-century city. Paris, London, New York, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Daston, L., and Galison, P. (2018), Ob”ektivnost’ [Objectivity], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia.
9. Desmond, J.C. (2016), Displaying death and animating life. Human-animal relations in art, science, and everyday life, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
10. Edwards, J.C. (1996), “The value of old photographs of zoological collections”, in Hoage, R.J. and Deiss, W.A., eds., New worlds, new animals. From menagerie to zoological park in the 19th century, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA, pp. 141–150.
11. Gavrishina, O.V. (2013), “The motive of ‘modern ruins’ in the American photography of the 2000s”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Cultural Studies. Art Studies. Museology” Series, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 88–96.
12. Gavrishina, O.V. (2018), “The photography as ruin”, Shagi/Steps, vol. 4, no. 3–4, pp. 59–67.
13. Gordon, R.B. (2009), Dances with Darwin, 1875–1910. Vernacular modernity in France, Routledge, London, UK.
14. Green-Lewis, J. (2017), Victorian photography, literature and the invention of modern memory. Already the past, Bloomsbury, London, UK.
15. Gusarova, K. (2023), “Birds on hats. The birth of disgust”, Teoriya mody: Odezhda. Telo. Kul’tura, iss. 67, pp. 135–165.
16. Harte, T. (2009), Fast forward. The aesthetics and ideology of speed in Russian avantgarde culture, 1910–1930, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, USA.
17. Johnson, G.A. (2018), “ ‘In consequence of their whiteness’. Photographing marble sculpture from Talbot to today”, in Napoli, J.N. and Tronzo, W., eds., Radical marble. Architectural innovation from Antiquity to the present, Routledge, London, UK, pp. 107–131.
18. Long, J. (2011), “Portable pets. Live and apparently live animals in fashion, 1880–1925”, Teoriya mody: Odezhda. Telo. Kul’tura, iss. 21, pp. 127–150.
19. Smith, Sh.M. (2013), At the edge of sight. Photography and the unseen, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, UK.
20. Tucker, J. (2013), Nature exposed. Photography as eyewitness in Victorian science, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.
21. Vainshtein, O. (2017), “Everybody lies. Photoshop, fashion and the body”, Teoriya mody: Odezhda. Telo. Kul’tura, iss. 43, pp. 200–234.
Supplementary files
For citation: Gusarova K.O. Between truth and absurdity? Turn-of-the-century taxidermists look at snapshots of animals RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(4):105-124. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-4-105-124
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
