Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

The category of reader’s literacy in Sergei Tret’yakov’s “literature of fact”

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-11-288-297

Abstract

The article deals with identifying the specifics of applying the category of reader’s literacy in Sergei Tret’yakov’s theory “literature of fact” and its role in deconstructing traditional notions of artistic creation and authorship. It shows how an expanded understanding of literacy becomes an instrument for the functionalization of literature as a means of recording and transforming social reality, particularly in overcoming the boundaries between author and reader. To this end, the evolution of the concept of literacy is analyzed. The main focus is on Tret’yakov’s important theoretical theses, and it is revealed that a key role in his theory is played by the idea of involving the reading masses in active writing as a condition for recording facts. The role of technological tools, including photography, as instruments for simplifying the writing of non-professionals is also considered. Beside it sees into the connection between practical literacy and the rejection of fiction, as well as the blurring of boundaries between writer and reader. Following Mikhail Bakhtin’s ideas, the author analyzes the consequences of Tret’yakov’s reinterpretation of the concept of literacy, which turn out to be destructive moments in the effacement of the boundaries of aesthetics. The article emphasizes the importance of problematizing the “literature of fact” for literary theory in the context of the “crisis of authorship” in the 20th century and the search for new literary practices.

About the Author

Youngsu Lee
Russian State University for the Humanities
Россия

Youngsu Lee, postgraduate student

 6-6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047



References

1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1986), “Author and hero in aesthetic activity”, in Bakhtin, M.M., Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creative work], Iskusstvo, Moscow, USSR, pp. 7–180.

2. Bakhtin, M.M. (1990), Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura srednevekov’ya i Renessansa [The works of François Rabelais and the popular culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance], Khudozhestvennaya literatura, Moscow, USSR, 545 p.

3. Barton, D. (2007), Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language, WileyBlackwell, Oxford, UK.

4. Lee, Yo. (2023), 세르게이 트레티야코프의 생산주의 기획에 나타난 생산 과정의 총 괄적 조망: 수용자 대중의 측면을 통한 접근 [A general look for the production process of Sergei Sergei Tret’iakov’ as a representative of the “Industrial Art” movement from the perspective of the mass audience], Master’s dissertation, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

5. Mironov, B.N. (1996), “The development of literacy in Russia and the USSR over a thousand years. 10th – 20th centuries”, in Bespyatykh, N.G., ed., Studia Humanistica: Issledovaniya po istorii i filologii [Studia Humanistica. Studies in history and philology], Russko-Baltiiskii informatsionnyi tsentr “Blits”, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 24–46.

6. Reischl, K.M.H. (2018), Photographic literacy. Cameras in the hands of Russian authors, Cornell University Press, New York, USA.


Review

For citations:


Lee Y. The category of reader’s literacy in Sergei Tret’yakov’s “literature of fact”. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2025;(11(2)):288-297. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-11-288-297

Views: 10

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)