The image of Marcus Aurelius in the early Christian literature


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-16-24

Full Text:




Abstract

The  paper  presents  a study  of the  transformation of the  image of Marcus  Aurelius in the Christian literature of the 2nd  – 5th  centuries:  from the protector of Christians to their  persecutor. The apologists of the 2nd  – 3d centuries constructed the image of the emperor-philosopher with positive  attitude towards  Christianity. A significant  group  of apologies were addressed directly  to Mark  Aurelius,  what  can be considered as evidence  of a positive attitude towards  that  person. Tertullian tells the story of a miraculous  saving of the Legio XII Fulminata during  the campaign  of Marcus  Aurelius  against Marcomanns war thanks  to the Christian soldiers prayings.

Changing attitudes  towards   Marcus  Aurelius  among  the  early  church historians of the  4th–5th   centuries is associated  with  the  gradual  shift  away from the  Roman  and early Christian traditions and the  increasing  emphasis on the  history  of martyrdom. Eusebius  of Caesarea  in order  to combine  the positive  opinion  of Tertullian with  reports  about  the persecution of the Lyon and Vienna martyrs  (177)  transfers  the responsibility for the latter to Marcus Aurelius brother.  In later authors,  such as Paul orozii and Aurelius Augustine, Marcus Aurelius is already called the persecutor without any reservations.


About the Author

P. N. Lebedev
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Pavel N. Lebedev - PhD  in History.

bld.  6, Miusskaya  sq., Moscow,  125993.



References

1. Keresztes P. Marcus Aurelius a Persecutor? The Harvard Theological Review. 1968;3:321-41.

2. Birley A. Marcus Aurelius: A Biography. London: Routledge Publ.; 2000. 320 p.

3. Panteleev AD. Christian martyrdom: History of the phenomenon and genre. V: Early martyrdom. Translations, comments, research. Sankt-Peterburg: Gumanitarnaya kniga, 2017. p. 5-30. (In Russ.)

4. Edwards M. Religion in the Age of Marcus Aurelius. V: Ackeren M., van., ed. A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Malden, MA; oxford: Wiley–Blackwell Publ.; 2012. p. 200-16.

5. MacMullen R. Christianizing the Roman Empire (A.D. 100–400). New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1984. 183 p.

6. Edwards M. et al. Introduction: Apologetics in the Roman World. V: Edwards M., Goodman M., Price S., eds. Apologetics in the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians. oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999. p. 1-14.

7. Jacobsen AC. Apologetics and Apologies – Some Definitions. V: Ulrich J., Jacobsen AC., Kahlos M., eds. Continuity and Discontinuity in Early Christian Apologetics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009. p. 5-21.

8. Panteleev AD. Christianity in the Roman Empire in 2nd - 3d centuries A.D. Towards an issue of the relationship of the new religious trends and traditional society with the state. PhD thesis [Internet]. [dis. ... kand. ist. nauk ]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2004. 266 p. [data obrashcheniya 21 Aug. 2018]. URL: https://dlib.rsl.ru/01002740030 (In Russ.)

9. Sage M.M. Eusebius and the Rain Miracle: Some observations. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 1987;1:96-113.

10. Panteleev AD. Legio Fulminata: the christian legend and reality. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 2: History. 2007;3:143-49. (In Russ.)

11. Kovács P. Marcus Aurelius’ Rain Miracle and the Marcomannic Wars. Leiden; Boston: Brill Publ.; 2009. 301 p.

12. Tyulenev VM. Lactantius: A Chrsitian historian at the crossroad of eras. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 2000. 319 p. (In Russ.)

13. Krivushin IV. Early Byzantine Church Historiography. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 1998. 300 p. (In Russ.)

14. Grant RM. The Case against Eusebius, or, Did the Father of History write History? Studia Patristica. 1975;12:413-21.

15. Barnes TD. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981. 458 p.


Supplementary files

For citation: Lebedev P.N. The image of Marcus Aurelius in the early Christian literature. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(10):16-24. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-16-24

Views: 333

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)