The image of Marcus Aurelius in the early Christian literature
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-16-24
Abstract
The paper presents a study of the transformation of the image of Marcus Aurelius in the Christian literature of the 2nd – 5th centuries: from the protector of Christians to their persecutor. The apologists of the 2nd – 3d centuries constructed the image of the emperor-philosopher with positive attitude towards Christianity. A significant group of apologies were addressed directly to Mark Aurelius, what can be considered as evidence of a positive attitude towards that person. Tertullian tells the story of a miraculous saving of the Legio XII Fulminata during the campaign of Marcus Aurelius against Marcomanns war thanks to the Christian soldiers prayings.
Changing attitudes towards Marcus Aurelius among the early church historians of the 4th–5th centuries is associated with the gradual shift away from the Roman and early Christian traditions and the increasing emphasis on the history of martyrdom. Eusebius of Caesarea in order to combine the positive opinion of Tertullian with reports about the persecution of the Lyon and Vienna martyrs (177) transfers the responsibility for the latter to Marcus Aurelius brother. In later authors, such as Paul orozii and Aurelius Augustine, Marcus Aurelius is already called the persecutor without any reservations.
About the Author
P. N. LebedevRussian Federation
Pavel N. Lebedev - PhD in History.
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993.
References
1. Keresztes P. Marcus Aurelius a Persecutor? The Harvard Theological Review. 1968;3:321-41.
2. Birley A. Marcus Aurelius: A Biography. London: Routledge Publ.; 2000. 320 p.
3. Panteleev AD. Christian martyrdom: History of the phenomenon and genre. V: Early martyrdom. Translations, comments, research. Sankt-Peterburg: Gumanitarnaya kniga, 2017. p. 5-30. (In Russ.)
4. Edwards M. Religion in the Age of Marcus Aurelius. V: Ackeren M., van., ed. A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Malden, MA; oxford: Wiley–Blackwell Publ.; 2012. p. 200-16.
5. MacMullen R. Christianizing the Roman Empire (A.D. 100–400). New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1984. 183 p.
6. Edwards M. et al. Introduction: Apologetics in the Roman World. V: Edwards M., Goodman M., Price S., eds. Apologetics in the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians. oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999. p. 1-14.
7. Jacobsen AC. Apologetics and Apologies – Some Definitions. V: Ulrich J., Jacobsen AC., Kahlos M., eds. Continuity and Discontinuity in Early Christian Apologetics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009. p. 5-21.
8. Panteleev AD. Christianity in the Roman Empire in 2nd - 3d centuries A.D. Towards an issue of the relationship of the new religious trends and traditional society with the state. PhD thesis [Internet]. [dis. ... kand. ist. nauk ]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2004. 266 p. [data obrashcheniya 21 Aug. 2018]. URL: https://dlib.rsl.ru/01002740030 (In Russ.)
9. Sage M.M. Eusebius and the Rain Miracle: Some observations. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 1987;1:96-113.
10. Panteleev AD. Legio Fulminata: the christian legend and reality. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 2: History. 2007;3:143-49. (In Russ.)
11. Kovács P. Marcus Aurelius’ Rain Miracle and the Marcomannic Wars. Leiden; Boston: Brill Publ.; 2009. 301 p.
12. Tyulenev VM. Lactantius: A Chrsitian historian at the crossroad of eras. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 2000. 319 p. (In Russ.)
13. Krivushin IV. Early Byzantine Church Historiography. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 1998. 300 p. (In Russ.)
14. Grant RM. The Case against Eusebius, or, Did the Father of History write History? Studia Patristica. 1975;12:413-21.
15. Barnes TD. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981. 458 p.
Supplementary files
For citation: Lebedev P.N. The image of Marcus Aurelius in the early Christian literature. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(10):16-24. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-16-24
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.