Pogrom of Prague Jewry of 1389 and its depiction in liturgy by Avigdor Karo and in “Passions of Jews of Prague”
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-45-53
Abstract
This article focuses on pogrom of Prague Jewry that happened during Easter celebration in April of 1389. Unlike other pogroms in Czech kingdom, Prague pogrom was at least formally a blood libel and was perpetrated by local Czechs, thus differentiating from other similar incidents perpetrated by German crusaders. Traditionally, the Prague pogrom is regarded as the bloodiest in Czech Jewish history. Despite the pogrom mentioning in over twenty sources, this article will study its depictions in two diametrically opposed, emotionally charged sources – “Passions of the Jews of Prague”, and a liturgy written by a Jewish eyewitness, Avigdor Karo. The goal of this article is to study the Prague pogrom of 1389 and its causes, which the author believes to be the worsening economical and financial situation in Czech Kingdom. The article will focus on dissecting “Passions of the Jews of Prague” as a thorough description of the tragedy , different from the rest of the references to the pogrom by the frank enjoyment of the Jewish tragedy, describing it as a triumph of the righteous Christians over enemies of Christ. Liturgy of Avigdor Karo is not only an eyewitness account of the event, but also a piece of literature that reflects the impression the pogrom left on its victims.
About the Author
A. A. NovikovaRussian Federation
Anne A. Novikova - postgraduate student.
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993.
References
1. Kantor M. Codex Judaica: Chronological index of Jewish History. New York: Zichron Press Publ.; 2005. 393 p.
2. Passio Judaeorum Pragensium secundum Johannem rusticum quadratum. V: Lehman P. Die Parodie im Mittelalter, mit 24 ausgewählten parodistischen Texten. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Hiersemann. 1963. S. 67-93.
3. Newman B. Medieval crossover. Reading the Secular against the Sacred. Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press, 2013. 398 p.
4. Machilek F. Ludolf von Sagan und seine Stellung in der Auseinandersetzung um Konziliarismus und Hussitismus. Munich: Lerche Publ.; 1967. 256 S.
5. Wetzlar J. von. Dialogus super Magnificat, vv. 2139–41. V: Bauer ES. Frömmigkeit, Gelehrsamkeit und Zeitkritik an der Schwelle der grossen Konzilien: Johannes von Wetzlar und sein Dialogus super Magnificat (1427). Mainz: Gesellschaft für mittelrheinische Kirchengeschichte Publ.; 1981. S. 163-313.
6. Yuval I.J. Two Nations in Your Womb: Perceptions of Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006. 313 p.
7. Levy RS., ed. Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIo Publ.; 2005. 828 p.
8. Bynum C.W. Wonderful Blood: Theology and Practice in Late Medieval Northern Germany and Beyond. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007. 402 p.
9. Putik A. on the Topography and Demography of the Prague Jewish Town Prior to the Pogrom of 1389. Judaica Bohemiae. 1994/1995;30-1:7-46.
10. Hlaváček I., Hledíková Zd., eds. Protocollum visitationis archidiaconatus Pragensis annis 1379–1382 per Paulum de Janowicz, archidiaconum Pragensem factae. Prague: Academia scientiarum bohemoslovacae Publ.; 1973. 529 p.
11. Shaff F. The history of the Christian church. 8 vols. Vol. 5: Medieval Christianity. From Gregory VII to Boniface VIII 1049–1294 AD. Sankt-Peterburg: Litres Publ.; 2017. 514 p. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Novikova A.A. Pogrom of Prague Jewry of 1389 and its depiction in liturgy by Avigdor Karo and in “Passions of Jews of Prague”. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(10):45-53. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-45-53
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.