Max Weber about Factors of “Worthy Peace” (1916–1919)


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-119-130

Full Text:




Abstract

The foreign and domestic policy was considered by M. Weber from the  national  point  of view. In 1916 he regarded  Russia  as the  main threat for Germany and sаw the way to peace in the agreement with England. The Russian February revolution changed  his position,  but only after April crisis he was inclined to conclude peace with Russia. At the same time, Weber sharply criticized the German submarine war, but did not support the pacifism of German students In 1916–1918 the scientist linked the issue of peace with the parliamentarization of German  government and the democratization in Germany.  He was sure that the government’s control  over the Kaiser could prevent  the catastrophe. Professor attributed the absence of a democratic political culture in Germany with the activities of Bismarck, who hampered  the development of parliamentarism. The scientist  was a member of German  delegation  at the  Paris  Conference.  Weber perceived the rejection  of the terms of the Versailles peace as a threat to the loss of Germany’s sovereignty, but did not consider the Treaty of Versailles as a “worthy peace”. Weber did not approve the project of this Treaty and perceived it as a prologue to the further disasters of Germany. In the summer of 1919 the scientist called for combination in “the ethics of responsibility” and “ethic of persuasion” in politics and considered those categories as complementary categories.


About the Author

N. V. Rostislavleva
Russian State University for Humanities; National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Rostislavleva - Doctor in History, professor.

bld. 6, Miusskaya  sq., Moscow, 125993; bld. 31, Kashirskoe  shosse, Moscow, 115409.



References

1. Mommsen W. Max Weber und die deutsche Politik. 1890–1920. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Publ.; 1974. 586 S.

2. Kaube J. Max Weber. Ein Leben zwischen Epochen. Berlin: Rowohlt, 2014. 494 S.

3. Radkau J. Max Weber. Die Leidenschaft des Denkens. München: Carl Hanser Publ.; 2013. 925 S.

4. Weber M. Max Weber’s Life and Works. Moscow: RoSSPEN Publ.; 2007. 654 p. (In Russ.)

5. Rostislavleva NV. Max Weber in the Years of the First World War. V: RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series: Historical Studies. General History. 2014;13:136-45. (In Russ.)

6. Kaube J. Max Weber. At the Cusp of Two Epochs. Moscow: Delo Publ.; 2016. 597 p. (In Russ.)

7. Weber M. Russlands Übergang zur Scheindemokratie. V: Weber M. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 15. Abteilung I. Zur Politik im Weltkrieg. Schriften und Reden 1914–1918. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Publ.; 1989. S. 236-60.

8. Weber M. Die russische Revolution und der Friede. V: Weber M. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 15. Abteilung I. Zur Politik im Weltkrieg. Schriften und Reden 1914–1918. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Publ.; 1984. 297 S.

9. Weber M. Electoral Law and Democracy in Germany. V: Weber M. The Political Works. 1895–1919. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2003. p. 40-106. (In Russ.)

10. Weber M. Parliament and Government in New Germany. Bismarck’s Legacy. V: Weber M. The Political Works. 1895–1919. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2003. p. 107-26. (In Russ.)

11. Schulze H. Kleine deutsche Geschichte. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ.; 2004. 256 p. (In Russ.)

12. Weber M. Gesamtausgabe. Abteilung I. Zur Neuordnung Deutschlands. Schriften und Reden 1918–1920. Bd. 16. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Publ.; 1988. 273 S. (In Russ.)

13. Weber M. Zum Thema des Kriegsschuld. V: Weber M. Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 16. Abteilung I. Zur Neuordnung Deutschlands. Schriften und Reden 1918–1920. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Publ.; 1988. S. 178-89. (In Russ.)

14. Weber M. Politics as a Vocation and a Profession. V: Weber M. Selected Works. Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. Moscow; Sankt-Peterburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ.; 2014. p. 485-28. (In Russ.).


Supplementary files

For citation: Rostislavleva N.V. Max Weber about Factors of “Worthy Peace” (1916–1919). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(10):119-130. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-119-130

Views: 349

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)