Preview

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series

Advanced search

Poetological topics in Novalis’ fragments

https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-2-19-29

Abstract

In the present article an attempt is made to bring Novalis’ fragments into correlation with pre-romantic poetological tradition. This tradition was not rejected by Novalis, but rather was used as a material for his own theoretical constructions. A few examples demonstrate that the European poetological topoi, though variously transformed, retain significance for Novalis. Thus, Novalis turnes to the topos “poetry is a reflection of cosmic music” when he asserts the unity of the poetic meters and the rhythms of the universe. He also creates his own variation on the topos “poetry is the sum of all sciences” which has ancient roots and is often found in Renaissance “Defences of poetry”. Realization of this topos Novalis refers to the future when poetry becomes the universal form for all sciences.

In thoughts of the poet Novalis oscillates between opposite poetological poles, sometimes leaning towards the Horatian topos of the poet-sage and attributing to the poet the gift of omniscience, and sometimes varying Platonic topos of the “poet possessed by the Muses” (in Novalis’ case the poet is taken by the “great rhythm” of the universe unconsciously obeying to some cosmic laws). Finally, the idea of mimesis as a “dramatic” immersion in another personality (the idea which goes back to Plato) is translated into fragments where the genius is credited with the ability to absorb other personalities and to be simultaneously several people.

About the Author

A. E. Makhov
Russian State University for the Humanities; A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Alexander E. Makhov, Dr of Sci. (Philology), professor

bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, GSP-3, Russia, 125993; 

bld. 25a, Povarskaya st., Moscow, Russia, 121069



References

1. Behler E. German romantic literary theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 344 p.

2. Villinger R. Lines of thought. Theory and poetry in Novalis. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte. 2012;4:547-77.

3. Novalis. Complete works. 5 Vol. Vol. 2: Philosophical texts. Werk. I. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1965. XVI, 784 S.

4. Novalis. Complete works. In 5 Vol. Vol. 2: Philosophical texts. Werk II. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1968. VII, 1076 S.

5. Boccaccio G. Genealogy of gods. 2 vol. Vol. 2. Bari: Laterza, 1951. 482 p.

6. Sidney Ph. The Defence of Poesy. V: Sidney Ph. Selected Prose and Poetry. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983. p. 99-160.

7. Salutati C. Hercules’ labours. 2 vol. Vol. 1. Zürich: Artemis, 1951. XIV, 352 p.

8. Puttenham G. The Arte of English Poesie. London: Bloomsbury, 1869. 320 p.

9. Schlegel A.W. Letters on Poetry, Meter, and Language. V: Völker L., Hrsg. Lyriktheorie. Texte vom Barock bis zur Gegenwart. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1990. S. 131– 143.

10. Curtius E.R. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. 8 Aufl. Bern; München: Francke, 1973. 608 S.

11. Klaj J. Praise of German Poetry. V: Klaj J. Redeoratorien und “Lobrede der Teutschen Poeterey”. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1965. S. 384–411.

12. Horace. The art of poetry. V: Horace. Odes. Epods. Satire. Messages. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ.; 1970. p. 383-95. [In Russ.]

13. Plato. The republic. V: Plato. Collection of Works. 4 vol. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ.; 1994. p. 79-420. [In Russ.]


Review

For citations:


Makhov A.E. Poetological topics in Novalis’ fragments. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2019;(2):19-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2019-2-19-29

Views: 225


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)