A General Inventory of Surface-Syntactic Relations. Part One
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2015-8-75-103
Аннотация
A universal list of surface-syntactic relations [SSyntRels] is compiled based on the idea that a SSyntRel r is “the same” in different languages if and only if this r has the same set of core functions in all these languages (just like the nominative in different languages is still a nominative since it is used everywhere for nomination - its core function; its other functions might be different). A few remarks are formulated on the Deep-Syntactic structure: 12 universal deep-syntactic relations are briefly introduced, and a list of 30 fictitious lexemes is presented (they are used in DSyntSs to represent syntactic constructions carrying lexical-type meanings). After a concise characterization of SSyntRels, the paper offers a list of 112 SSyntRels known in world languages: subordinate and coordinate; the subordinate SSyntRels are divided into clause-level and phrase-level SSyntRels, with further subdivision into valence-controlled vs. non-valence-controlled and then into Noun Phrase SSyntRels, Adpositional Phrase SSyntRels, etc.
Об авторе
Игорь Александрович Мельчук
Канадское Королевское общество; Австрийская Академия Наук; Безансонский университет (Франция)
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Danlos L., Sagot B., Stern R. Analyse discursivedes incises de citation // Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française - CMLF2010 / Ed. par F . Neveu, V. Muni Toke, J. Durand, T. Klingler, L. Mondada, S. Prévost. P.: Institut de linguistique française, 2010. P. 2237-2254. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOHw7lX3Gu4
2. Haspelmath M. The Serial Verb Construction: Comparative Concept and Cross-linguistic Generalizations. 2015. URL: https://www.academia.edu/10652772/The_serial_verb_construction_Comparative_concept_and_cross-linguistic_generalizations
3. Imrényi, András. The Syntax of Hungarian Auxiliaries. A Dependency Grammar Account // Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics [DEPLING2013] / Ed. by E. Hajičová, K. Gerdes, L. Wanner. Prague: Charles University, 2013. P. 118-127.
4. Иомдин Л. О модели русского синтаксиса // Теоретические проблемы русского синтаксиса. Взаимодействие грамматики и словаря / Под ред.
5. Ю. Апресяна, И. Богуславского, Л. Иомдина, В. Санникова. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2010. С. 21-43.
6. Iordanskaja L., Mel’čuk I. On a Class of Russian Verbs Which Can Introduce Direct Speech // The Slavic Verb / Ed. by P. Jakobsen, H. Krag. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger, 1981. P. 51-66.
7. Iordanskaja L., Mel’čuk I. Establishing an Inventory of Surface-Syntactic Relations: Valence-Controlled Surface-Syntactic Dependents of the Verb in French // Dependency in Linguistic Description / Ed. by A. Polguère, I. Mel’čuk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. P. 151-234.
8. Marneffe M.-C. de, Manning C. 2008-2015. Stanford Typed Dependencies Manual. URL: http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/dependencies_manual.pdf
9. Mel’čuk I. Опыт теории лингвистических моделей «Смысл ⇔ текст». Семантика, синтаксис. М.: Наука, 1974.
10. Mel’čuk I. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany, N.Y.: The SUNY Press, 1988.
11. Mel’čuk I. Dependency in Natural Language / Ed. by A. Polguère, I. Mel’čuk. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009. P. 1-110.
12. Mel’čuk I. Язык: от смысла к тексту. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2012
13. Mel’čuk I. Semantics: From Meaning to Text: In 3 vols. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2012
14. Mel’čuk I. The East/South-East Asian Answer to the European Passive // Acta Linguistica petropolitana / Ed. by S. Dmitrenko, N. Zaika. 2014. Vol. 10 (3) P. 451-472.
15. Mel’čuk I. Syntactic Subject: Syntactic Relations, Once Again // Язык. Константы. Переменные : Памяти А.Е. Кибрика: Сб. научных ст. СПб.: Алетейя, 2014. С. 169-216.
16. Mel’čuk I., Pertsov N. Surface Syntax of English. A Formal Model within the Meaning-Text Framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1987.
17. Dependency in Linguistic Description / A. Polguère, I. Mel’čuk. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009.
18. Wechsler S. The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University, 1995.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Мельчук И.А. . ВЕСТНИК РГГУ. Серия «Литературоведение. Языкознание. Культурология». 2015;(8):75-103. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2015-8-75-103
For citation:
Mel’Čuk I. A General Inventory of Surface-Syntactic Relations. Part One. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2015;(8):75-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2015-8-75-103
Просмотров:
330
Послать статью по эл. почте 