Mechanisms and methods of modeling of perception of the world in text generation and reception

The aim of the analysis is to identify the ways of mental modeling of a complex of heterogeneous information about the world by a single subject of cognition and communication who possesses personal identity and shares language and collective identity within other members of a particular culture. The analysis is performed on the example of a hybrid popular science journalistic ludic text. Generalizations are formulated based on the comparison of evaluative judgments about the same text made by different recipients who share the same culture with the author of the perceived text. The most soughtafter methods and means of modeling historical processes that took place in Germany and are well-known to every member of the culture are described.

1. Babina, L.V. (2003), Kognitivnye osnovy vtorichnykh znachenii yavlenii v yazyke i rechi [Cognitive foundations of secondary meanings in language and speech], Izdatel’stvo TGU, Tambov, Russia.

2. Babushkin, A.P. (2001), “Vozmozhnye miry” v semanticheskom prostranstve yazyka [“Possible worlds” in the semantic space of language], Voronezhskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, Voronezh, Russia.

3. Grishaeva, L.I. (2022), Dialogi o mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii [Dialogues on intercultural communication], NAUKA-UNIPRESS, Voronezh, Russia.

4. Korneva, V.V. and Tuzhikova, D.B. (2023), Orotoponimy v ispanskoi yazykovoi kartine mira [Orotoponyms in the Spanish language worldview], NAUKA-UNIPRESS, Voronezh, Russia.

5. Kornilov, O.A. (1999), Yazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye natsional’nykh mentalitetov [Linguistic worldviews as derivatives of national mentalities], Izdatel’stvo MGU, Moscow, Russia.

6. Kostrova, O.A., ed. (2015), Diskursivnye stereotipy: mezhkul’turnyi aspekt kontseptosfery [Discursive stereotypes: the intercultural aspect of the conceptual sphere], Izdatel’stvo PGSGA, Samara, Russia.

7. Kremneva, A.V. (2017), Intertekstual’nost’ kak odna iz form mezhtekstovogo vzaimodeistviya v semioticheskom prostranstve [Intertextuality as one of the forms of cross-textual interaction in the semiotic space], AltGTU im. I.I. Polzunova, Barnaul, Russia.

8. Kubryakova, E.S. (1988), “The role of word formation in shaping the language worldview”, in Serebrennikov, B.A., ed., Semantika yazykovykh edinits: Doklady VI Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [The role of human factor in language. Language and the worldview], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 141–172.

9. Kubryakova, E.S. (1998), “Cognitive aspects in the study of lexical semantics”, Semantika yazykovykh edinits: Doklady VI Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [Semantics of language units. Reports of the 6[th] International Conference], vol. 1, Moscow, Russia, pp. 47–50.

10. Kubryakova, E.S. (2004), Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge: On the way to gaining knowledge and language worldview], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia. ( Yazyk. Semiotika. Kul’tura )

11. Pishchalnikova, V.A. (2021), Istoriya i teoriya psikholingvistiki [History and theory of psycholinguistics], R. Valent, Moscow, Russia.

12. Postovalova, V.I. (1987), “Is there a linguistic worldview?”, in Yazyk kak kommunikativnaya deyatel’nost’ cheloveka [Language as a human communicative activity], iss. 284, Moscow, USSR, pp. 65–72.

13. Postovalova, V.I. (1988), “The worldview in human life”, in Serebrennikov, B.A., ed.,

14. Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: Yazyk i kartina mira [The role of human factor in language. Language and the worldview], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 8–69.

15. Reischer, Jü. (2002), Die Sprache. Ein Phänomen und seine Erforschung, Walter der Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, New York, USA.

16. Weinrich, H. (1976), Sprache in Texten, Ernst Klett Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.