Poetical work as a musical process. Formal aesthetics of Friedrich Konrad Griepenkerl and Friedrich Hölderlin poetology

Alexander Makhov

doi:10.28995/2073-6355-2018-2-163-171

Poetical work as a musical process. Formal aesthetics of Friedrich Konrad Griepenkerl and Friedrich Hölderlin poetology

Alexander Makhov

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-2-163-171

Abstract

Throughout its history the poetics has used models borrowed from music. one of such models may be defined as that of processuality: according to this model, poetical work, as a musical one, is developing intime by means of “dissonances” and their “resolutions”. Idea of processuality of any aesthetic form was formulated by F.K. Griepenkerl, who, however, did not provide specific examples as to application of that idea to poetry. A complement to the formal aesthetics of Griepenkerl may be found in F. Hölderlin’s poetological texts where poetry is considered to be simultaneously a dialectical and a musical process which involves the confrontation of opposite “tones”.

Keywords

музыкальность поэзии, процессуальность эстетической формы, диссонанс, Ф.К. Грипенкерль, Ф. Гёльдерлин, musicality of poetry, processuality of aesthetic form, dissonance, F.K. Griepenkerl, F. Hölderlin,

About the Author

Alexander Makhov

Russian State University for the Humanities; Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

References

1. Sidney Ph. A Defence of Poesie and Poems. London; New York: Cassel and Company, 1909. P. 126.

2. Махов А.Е. Формирование теории лирики как литературного рода (к вопросу о роли музыкальных аналогий в истории поэтики) // Литературоведческий журнал. 2008. № 23. С. 84-110.

3. Morley Th. A plaine and easie Introduction to practicall Musicke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937. P. 180.

4. Novel and Romance,1700-1800: A documentary record / I. Williams (ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970. P. 275-276.

5. Stöckmann I. Form, Theorie, Methode. Die formale Ästhetik des 19 Jahrhunderts // Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte. 2016. Jg 90, H. 1. S. 57-108.

6. Herbart J.F. Lehrbuch zur Einleitung in die Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner, 1993. S. 143.

7. Griepenkerl K.F. Lehrbuch der Ästhetik. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1826. S. 78.

8. Hölderlin F. Grund zum Empedokles // Hölderlin F. Sämtliche Werke / F. Beissner (hrsg.). Leipzig: Insel-Verlag, 1965. S. 885-886.

9. Reisinger P. Hölderlins poetologische Topologie Oder: Die Bedingungen der Möglichkeit zur ästhetischen Imterpretation von Poesie // Bachmaier H., Horst Th., Reisinger P. Hölderlin: Transzendentale Reflexion der Poesie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1979. S. 12-82.

10. Hölderlin F. Über die Verfahrungsweise des poetischen Geistes // Hölderlin F. Sämtliche Werke / F. Beissner (hrsg.). Leipzig: Insel-Verlag, 1965. S. 966.

11. Hölderlin F. An Neuffer, 3 Jul. 1799 // Hölderlin F. Sämtliche Werke. Bd. 6: Briefe / A. Beck (hrsg.). Berlin: Rütten & Loening, 1959. S. 364.

12. Batteux Ch. Principes de la littérature. Paris: Desaint et Saillant, 1764. Vol. 1. P. 242-243.

13. Horst Th. Wechsel und Sein. Die Ambivalenz des Absoluten in Hölderlins Poetik // Bachmaier H., Horst Th., Reisinger P. Hölderlin: Transzendentale Reflexion der Poesie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1979. S. 146-187.

14. Hölderlin F. Über den Unterschied der Dichtarten // Hölderlin F. Sämtliche Werke / F. Beissner (hrsg.). Leipzig: Insel-Verlag, 1965. S. 989-991.

15. Лосев А.Ф. Музыка как предмет логики // Лосев А.Ф. Из ранних работ. М.: Правда, 1990. С. 209-210.

Supplementary files

For citation: Makhov A. Poetical work as a musical process. Formal aesthetics of Friedrich Konrad Griepenkerl and Friedrich Hölderlin poetology. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(2-2):163-171. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-2-163-171

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)

Username
Password