The use of national symbols in the conduct of Slav Congresses in the 19th century


https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-131-142

Full Text:




Abstract

In  the  19th  – early  20th  centuries four the  most  famous Slav Congresses  took  place: in Prague  in 1848, in Moscow  and in St. Petersburg in 1867, a “secret” congress  in Prague  in 1868, Slavic Congress  in Prague  in 1908. The first three events were closely interrelated. All the Slavic congresses were focused on the ideology of the Slavic community and Pan-Slavism in its wide interpretation, fed on understanding of possibility to unite all Slavs on the basis of affinity of languages descended  from a common root.

Over discussions held in Russian media several issues were acknowledged which  should  have  become  part  of the  Delegates’  agenda  at  1987 Congress hosted in Moscow as well as Saint Petersburg. Those were the recurring questions  of Russian  language  as a tool  of cross-Slavic  dialog, of civilized  Slavic unity existence as well as its defining factors, and the significance of the Russian Empire  presence  in the vicinity  of the Slavic peoples. The Congress  organizers considered that  Russia in particular should become the cultural,  religious and indirectly political foundation for Slavic unity. The main uniting function was laid onto  the cross national  relations  language. The Austrian  Slavs were not able to solve that  issue for Danube  Empire during  the Slavic Congress  in Prague in 1848. In 1987 Russian intellectual elites promoted Russian language as the basis for the Slavic unity. Hence the ‘language’ question  turned into the main symbol of first Slavic congresses of 19th century.


About the Author

O. V. Saprikina
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Olga V. Saprikina - PhD  in History, associate professor.

bld. 6, Miusskaya  sq., Moscow, 125993.



References

1. Lapteva LP. The idea of Slavic mutuality and Slavic congresses of 19th century. V: Dostal MYu., ed. Slavic congresses of the 19th – 20th centuries. Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki RAN Publ.; 1994. p. 5-20. (In Russ.)

2. Hroch M. From national movements to a fully formed nation. V: Nation and nationalism. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2002. p. 121-45. (In Russ.)

3. Hobsbawm E. Nations and Nationalism after 1780. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 1998. 119 s. (In Russ.)

4. Gellner E. The Coming of Nationalism. Myths of the nation and class. V: Nation and nationalism. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.)

5. Naše národní minulost v dokumentech: Chrestomatie k dějinám Československa. D. 2: od zrušeni nevolnictví do revoluce roku 1848. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1962. S. 355-60.

6. Dostal МYu. Foreword. V: Ivanov AN., comp. All Russian Ethnographic Exhibition and Slavic Congress in May of 1867 in St. Peterburg and Moscow. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii Publ.; 2017. p. 3-29. (In Russ.)

7. Khartsieva GYu. “Secret Slavic congress” of 1868 in Prague. V: Dostal МYu., ed. Slavic congresses in the19th – 20th centuries. Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki RAN Publ.; 1994. p. 92-8. (In Russ.).


Supplementary files

For citation: Saprikina O.V. The use of national symbols in the conduct of Slav Congresses in the 19th century RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(10):131-142. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-131-142

Views: 328

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6355 (Print)