The use of national symbols in the conduct of Slav Congresses in the 19th century
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-131-142
Abstract
In the 19th – early 20th centuries four the most famous Slav Congresses took place: in Prague in 1848, in Moscow and in St. Petersburg in 1867, a “secret” congress in Prague in 1868, Slavic Congress in Prague in 1908. The first three events were closely interrelated. All the Slavic congresses were focused on the ideology of the Slavic community and Pan-Slavism in its wide interpretation, fed on understanding of possibility to unite all Slavs on the basis of affinity of languages descended from a common root.
Over discussions held in Russian media several issues were acknowledged which should have become part of the Delegates’ agenda at 1987 Congress hosted in Moscow as well as Saint Petersburg. Those were the recurring questions of Russian language as a tool of cross-Slavic dialog, of civilized Slavic unity existence as well as its defining factors, and the significance of the Russian Empire presence in the vicinity of the Slavic peoples. The Congress organizers considered that Russia in particular should become the cultural, religious and indirectly political foundation for Slavic unity. The main uniting function was laid onto the cross national relations language. The Austrian Slavs were not able to solve that issue for Danube Empire during the Slavic Congress in Prague in 1848. In 1987 Russian intellectual elites promoted Russian language as the basis for the Slavic unity. Hence the ‘language’ question turned into the main symbol of first Slavic congresses of 19th century.
About the Author
O. V. SaprikinaRussian Federation
Olga V. Saprikina - PhD in History, associate professor.
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993.
References
1. Lapteva LP. The idea of Slavic mutuality and Slavic congresses of 19th century. V: Dostal MYu., ed. Slavic congresses of the 19th – 20th centuries. Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki RAN Publ.; 1994. p. 5-20. (In Russ.)
2. Hroch M. From national movements to a fully formed nation. V: Nation and nationalism. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2002. p. 121-45. (In Russ.)
3. Hobsbawm E. Nations and Nationalism after 1780. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 1998. 119 s. (In Russ.)
4. Gellner E. The Coming of Nationalism. Myths of the nation and class. V: Nation and nationalism. Moscow: Praksis Publ.; 2002. (In Russ.)
5. Naše národní minulost v dokumentech: Chrestomatie k dějinám Československa. D. 2: od zrušeni nevolnictví do revoluce roku 1848. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1962. S. 355-60.
6. Dostal МYu. Foreword. V: Ivanov AN., comp. All Russian Ethnographic Exhibition and Slavic Congress in May of 1867 in St. Peterburg and Moscow. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii Publ.; 2017. p. 3-29. (In Russ.)
7. Khartsieva GYu. “Secret Slavic congress” of 1868 in Prague. V: Dostal МYu., ed. Slavic congresses in the19th – 20th centuries. Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki RAN Publ.; 1994. p. 92-8. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Saprikina O.V. The use of national symbols in the conduct of Slav Congresses in the 19th century RSUH/RGGU Bulletin: “Literary Teory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies”, Series. 2018;(10):131-142. https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2018-10-131-142
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.